Fri. Oct 23rd, 2020

KKH expansion victims condemn delays in compensation payment

By Farman Karim Baig

Gilgit, October 15: Assistant director of the National Highways Authority, Mohsin Islam Khan, along with a representative of the “Northern Areas Environmental Protection Agency” (NAEPA) visited Passu – Gojal to listen to complaints, demands and grievances of the people affected by ongoing work on expansion of the Karakuram Highway. The meeting was attended by people from Shishkat, Gulmit, Ghulkin, Hussaini and Passu. Mr Mutabiat Shah represented the affected people.

The assistant director was informed about the damage done to land and other properties of the people. The people also expressed anger and dissatisfaction over the delay in fixing of compensation for loss of property. The assistant director blamed the local administration for not being able to fix a price. He said that compensation payments would start when the land price is fixed. 

People also expressed concern over the deteriorating condition of environment of Gojal valley. Gojal, counting for more than 85 % of Hunza’s land, is the worst affected part of Gilgit – Baltistan by the KKH expansion project likely to be completed by 2012. Representative of NAEPA said that their organization would launch a plantation drive on both sides of the border to not only increase beauty of the region but also help reduction of the hazardous gases coming out of heavy vehicles. 

Mutabiat Shah, on behalf of the affected people, thanked representatives of NAEPA and NHA for listening to complaints of the people and expressed hope that rights of the common people would be protected while determining the land price. He also presented demanded of the KKH expansion victims for payment of compensation on urgent basis.    

3 thoughts on “KKH expansion victims condemn delays in compensation payment

  1. this good step towards the rights of the people of gojal. i request all the awam-un-nas of gojal and hunza to demand early completion of the KKH and also pay the compensation to the Poor on urgent basis. because they are suffering a lot.

  2. The fact that NHA has NOT undertaken third party EIA of the project and has not conducted public hearing on the report, it is doubtful whether the visit by an Assistant Director would replace that legal requirement under PEPA 97.

    The civil society and the political leaders should impress upon NAEPA to force NHA to comply with the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act 1997 laws by atleast incorporating provisional mitigation measures related to environment, cultural and social aspects of the project including fair compensation on market prices, implementation of labour laws, and protection of the natural environment.

  3. What about the Material which used CRBC like Stone,rath n Bajere.they will pay that cost or just give only Land Compesation?
    Hope in this meeting also discuss such that kind of Question raise?

    best wishes

    Roomi Farhat Beig Sostiq

Comments are closed.

Instagram did not return a 200.
%d bloggers like this: