Mon. Mar 30th, 2020

China rejects reports regarding presence of its forces in GB

By Naweed-e-Sahar

Beijing: September 3:  China has strongly rejected the media reports about the presence of Chinese forces in Gilgit-Baltistan

China has reacted strongly to the reports of New York Times and some other American newspapers about the presence of its forces in Gilgit-Baltistan region of Pakistan. Talking to media the Chinese foreign office spokesman Jiayang Yuw stated that such media reports are baseless and their only aim is to sabotage the Pak-China relationships. There is no truth in the reports that Chinese security personnel are present in Gilgit-Baltistan region of Pakistan.

He further reiterated that some people are not happy the way China is forging  good relations with Pakistan and India. So they are trying to create doubts in peoples mind and disturb the diplomatic relation between our countries, but we would not let them fulfill their ill will.

1 thought on “China rejects reports regarding presence of its forces in GB

  1. You can be sure any articler coming from the Washington Post or the New York Times is pure propaganda, disinformation and social engineering. These two papers are heavily biased in favor of Israel and the Washington Post is also directly at the orders of the CIA.
    Any international news published by these papers is to be read with extreme skepticism. Their news about South or Central America are very obviously biased against the progressive regimes that have ben elected in recent years, and whenever they want to discredit an idea they say that Fidel Castro likes it. And so it goes for the rest of the world.
    About Iran, they keep repeating that President Ahmadinejad said a few years ago that he wanted to “wipe Israel off the map” which is a dishonest mis-translation of a citation he used in a speech.
    It would be advisable in future to preface any article from these two papers with a warning concerning their bias, so the reader might extract the real meaning of the article instead of taking it at face value.

Comments are closed.

Instagram did not return a 200.
%d bloggers like this: